|
When network engineering gets hard (and it always does), most engineers retreat into one of two worlds Naive Optimism: The world where you tell yourself “AI won’t affect my role,” where every automation trend is overhyped and where the future feels safe because the past felt familiar. This mindset avoids the uncomfortable truth and clings to blind confidence. Hopeless Realism: The world where every advancement in AI feels like a threat, where every new automation tool signals your eventual replacement, where you face the facts but lose hope in your ability to adapt. Engineers in this group freeze, panic, or quietly disengage. But the people who thrive in this new era are the ones who grow stronger as AI reshapes the industry. They don’t live in either extreme. They operate at the collision of those two worlds. They blend Naive Optimism and Hopeless Realism into something far more powerful: practical, resilient, reality-based confidence. This mindset has a name: The Stockdale Paradox. And it’s exactly the mindset engineers need right now. Just like Admiral Stockdale, who survived because he held two truths at once, engineers must do the same: Never lose faith in your long-term ability to adapt, evolve, and thrive and at the same time ruthlessly confront the brutal reality that your role is changing faster than ever. The Engineer’s Stockdale Paradox
The first keeps you hopeful, curious, and open to transformation. The second keeps you honest, focused, and prepared for what’s coming. You need both to survive a career shaped by AI and to grow because of it. If you can look directly at the uncomfortable realities of the modern networking world; automation taking over ticket work, AI diagnosing issues, LLMs assisting configs and still believe you can carve out a future in this new landscape. You become unbeatable. The engineers who thrive in the AI era aren’t the ones who deny what’s happening. And they aren’t the ones who collapse under fear. They’re the ones who hold the paradox: See the truth clearly. Believe in yourself anyway. |
Join 1k+ other forward-thinking professionals who receive the weekly newsletter, where I provide actionable strategies, insights and tools to escape the grind and build influential, future-proof careers. Sign up and I will send yoy a FREE copy of my 5-Stage playbook to multiply your impact and build a career that AI can't replace.
Hello Reader, I spoke with an old friend last week. He told me he spent 4 years as a senior engineer watching less experienced engineers get to the next level ahead of him. His designs were cleaner. His solutions were faster. His technical reviews were thorough. But he kept getting the same feedback: "You need to be more visible and strategic" He thought that meant talking more in meetings. He was wrong. What he lacked was influence at work The Real Problem Here’s what actually happens when...
Hello Reader, Understanding this distinction would have saved me years of frustration in my engineering career. Every organization has two kinds of engineers. There are functional engineers and there are vital engineers. Most people never realize this, and it keeps them stuck far longer than necessary. I learned this the hard way, after confusing output with outcome for a long time. At first glance, functional engineers look impressive. They deliver tickets, close incidents, follow processes...
I’ve spent the last few years studying how influence actually works inside organizations, especially among engineers, ICs, and systems thinkers. Not the loud kind. Not the political kind. Not the manipulative kind. The kind that compounds quietly. Below are 26 influence rules I’m following going into 2026 and beyond. Principles for building credibility, trust, and authority without losing yourself in the process. Avoid unforced credibility errors. Most influence is lost through small,...